NBA Finals

For those of you who are watching the Lakers completly tear the Magic apart, i think its unfair for L.A. The Lakers took both home games from Orlando and now have to go to Florida where they will play a possible of 3 games. It wont take 3 games for the Lakers to win their 15th Championship, but it would be to their advantage for them to lose two of the games so they can close it out in California. Is it fair for the Lakers faithful fans not to be their when Kobe holds up his finals MVP trophey? I'm thinking its not. The way the NBA finals are set up so that the first two games are played in L.A. then the next 3 in Orlando and if needed games 6 and 7 are back in L.A. What i think would be better is if the first 2 games were in L.A and then the 3rd in Orlando. Now this is where it gets strange, whoever has the lead in the series should have home court advantage for game 4. If its tied after game 4 then it should go to the team that won more games in the regular seson. It would be this style up until games 6. If after game 6 the teams are tied 3-3 then it should be played in a neutral site, such as Las Vegas, This way the winning team can share their victory with their home town fans. (For example the Lakers won 2 in L.A. so lets say the Magic won the one they have in Orlando to make it 2-1, the next game would be in L.A. because they lead the finals series, The Magic tie it 2-2 in L.A. and since the Lakers wn more gmaes game 5 is in L.A, Orlando takes game 5 so they lead 3-2 so game 6 goes to Orlando so their fans can celebrate if the Magic won and if their was a game 7 it would be played in Vegas.)